I typed up this post about 30minutes ago or more & for some reason when I tried to post it I got booted off the internet..
And that ticks me off...
Anyway. I see you all have moved on, but I am still gonna post what I typed & I don't give adamn if anyone reads it now, but I am posting it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have two threads going that at least in part discuss Dave Canterbury, and we have had a few others in the past that discussed the same subject that didn't end well.
Not wanting to add to the derail of the ones that are still active I started this one, it's in the form of a question, lets hope anyone contributing will be civil in their replies.
My question, why do you think that the mere mention of Dave Canterbury, the Pathfinder school or store, or his videos almost always end up in argument, what is it about this guy that brings out the worst in some people ?
It seems to me that one one hand, there are some folks who have been doing this kind of stuff all of their lives, or a greater part of it,and learned their ways thru their family, friends, or other mentors, that helped them figure out the background & skills that go along with being a woodsman/bushcrafter. They spent their "dirt time" out in the wilds over the course of their life & through first hand experience getting in the "dirt time". The family, friends & mentors that helped them along were usually older, & had even more time/experience doing the stuff. Some had relatives going back for generations practicing these skills sometimes on an everyday basis, because the technology had not advanced to where we are today.
Then, on the other hand there are those who did not have that long term background & are either now starting to learn more or are supplementing what they have/had learned in the past, with Online mentors, like DC & others of his kind.
And of course there are those in between.
The differing opinions of how to rate DC ( or others of his kind) will certainly be noticeable , since those who are of the first group I mentioned, either know almost as much ( although perhaps in a different environment), know the same knowledge/skillsets as DC ( & others) or know more than DC ( & others) in wilderness knowledge & skills. They got their knowledge first hand and/or through those others I have mentioned, & they hold those others in HIGH esteem. (& sometimes themselves).
Where on the other hand, the ones who have learned just a little on their own or from a"mentor" type setting, and now gain much from DC will now hold DC in that HIGH esteem.
With the ones in between those two groups may be indifferent to the mentor group or DC ( & others) in the amount of esteem they place in those folks & are indifferent to the others on each end of the spectrum.
So, my thinking is it is a case of people of different mentalities on what DC can offer to them based on that persons background in the woodsman/bushcraft field.
The first group may think DC offers little as compared with themselves & their past experiences. The other group thinks DC offers much since they were not exposed to what the opposite group was exposed to. So like Football, you have two teams who are meeting on the field to have a match. There are fans who support & stand behind their team ( Old school mentors) & the fans of the other team ( DC & others) & of course those who like to watch football for the sport & care not who they support ( middle group)
All the groups enjoy Football (Woodsmanship/Bushcraft)
We all like it, but we are supporting our teams & our backgrounds in woods/bushcraft & how we have learned what we have. So when others give us the impression that "our" team is less important than "their" team, in that difference of opinion, there is gonna be tensions & disputes.
Well, that is my opinion on why folks have the disputes. Long winded, I know.... I wish I could be more concise. I am trying to get better at it everyday.
Next?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, there it is.